RAY v. STITT’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reeds v. Walker · State Ex Rel. Whitson v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co. · Dale v. City of Yukon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“R., Doc. 7, Order , pg. 1 (capitalization modified). ¶6 In response, Ray filed his Notice of Pending Action for an Alternative Writ of Mandamus . R., Doc. 8. In that document, Ray again notes that he believed he had already complied with the district court's prior notice requirement by mailing a copy of the motion to the respondents. Id. at 2 (footnote 2). Additionally, the document is directed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“R., Doc. 4, Re: Order of the Court in a Civil Action filed by an Inmate , pg. 1. ¶5 Ten months later, on April 6, 2022, the trial court issued an order noting that Ray did not appear to have served the respondents in accordance with the court's May 2021 order. The order stated:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“only by first class mail, the court apparently found that Ray had failed to follow its order. We agree that if service via § 2004 was required, Ray's notice was plainly insufficient. ¶15 State law, however, also provides for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.