Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 Pa. 199 - Commonwealth v. Conahan

Commonwealth v. Conahan’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Kyle (2005), Commonwealth v. Chiappini (2001)

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Kriston · Commonwealth v. Sojourner · Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co. · 388 Pa. Super. 369 - Commonwealth v. Conahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Conahan voluntarily committed himself to inpatient custodial alcohol rehabilitation, which he successfully completed after devoting ninety-five continuous days towards overcoming his disease. We find that his successful completion of this custodial inpatient rehabilitation, which took place in three hospitals, falls within the common meaning of "imprisonment" and is a sufficient "institutional setting" as contemplated by this Court in [ Commonwealth v. Kriston, 527 Pa. 90 , 588 A.2d 898 (1991)].”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Clearly, our acceptance of this type of inpatient "institutional rehabilitation" in no way entitles one accused of driving under the influence of alcohol to a credit for such rehabilitative commitment as of right . Rather, it is only an express approval of credits for such commitment that the sentencing court in its discretion deems to be sufficient. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court properly sentenced [the defendant] to the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, and then acted well within its discretion in awarding [the defendant] a credit of thirty days for time served in inpatient institutional rehabilitation and in granting him immediate parole.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “immediately conjures the image of being involuntarily confined behind bars. However, the dictionary definition and common usage is more encompassing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.