Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 SO2D 1178 - Enlow v. Blaney

Enlow v. Blaney’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · 360 So. 2d 1164 - Boyer v. Johnson · 213 So. 2d 169 - Hall v. State, Department of Highways · 154 So. 2d 579 - Dupre v. Louisiana Department of Highways · Dabov v. Allstate Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Police Jury is not responsible for every accident which may occur on a parish road, nor is it a guarantor of the safety of travelers thereon or an insurer against all injury which may result from obstructions on or defects in such a road. The duty of the Police Jury is only to see that parish roads are reasonably safe for persons exercising ordinary care and reasonable prudence. The Police Jury, however, is liable for damages caused by defects in a parish road which are in the nature of `traps,' and are sufficiently dangerous to cause an accident and an injury to a motorist using the highway in a reasonably prudent manner, if the Police Jury has had actual or constructive notice of the defect. Dupre v. Louisiana Department of Highways, 154 So.2d 579 (La.App. 3 Cir.1963)." Enlow v. Blaney, 527 So.2d 1178 , at page 1181 (La. App. 3 Cir.1988), writ den., 532 So.2d 151 (La.1988).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Local municipal and parish authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall place and maintain such traffic control devices upon highways under their jurisdiction as they may deem necessary to indicate and to carry out the provisions of this Chapter, regulations of the department and commissioner adopted pursuant hereto, and local traffic ordinances adopted pursuant to the authority granted by R.S. 32:41 and R.S. 32:42. All such traffic control devices hereafter erected shall conform to the department's manual or specifications. If any such device hereafter erected by a political subdivision of this state fails to conform to the manual or specifications, payment of any funds allocated to that political subdivision shall be withheld by the department until the standards established by the department are complied with."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.