Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 So. 2d 1349 - White v. State

527 So. 2d 1349 - White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2009

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

110198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yelton v. State · 33 Ala. App. 316 - Smitherman v. State · 466 So. 2d 167 - Bell v. State · 480 So. 2d 41 - Popwell v. State · 512 So. 2d 811 - Self v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The denial of a motion in limine can not in and of itself rise to the level of reversible error. 'This is true because the material against which the objection has been made has not yet been heard by the jury and may never be heard by them.' Brooks v. State , 443 So.2d 1301 , 1303 (Ala.Crim.App. 1983)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[E]vidence of other crimes may be admitted in the trial of the now-charged crime when it is relevant to the now-charged crime and tends to prove an element of the now-charged crime which is at issue. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “admitt[ed] that he hit the victim, but [denied] that he intended to seriously injure her . . . [thereby] plac[ing] the element of intent in issue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.