Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 So. 2d 148 - Ex Parte State

527 So. 2d 148 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2001

12 state decisions

100198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Hudson v. Louisiana · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States · Kentucky v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A] computer generated printout from the Department of Public Safety is admissible and sufficient evidence if it is properly certified by the official having custody of driving records in the state Department of Public Safety and if it shows the status of the accusedf’s] driver’s license on the date in question as being revoked, suspended, or cancelled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A contrary conclusion would lead the government to `overtry' its cases—to introduce redundant evidence of the defendant's guilt—in order to insure itself against the risk of not being able to retry the defendant should some of its evidence be held on appeal to be inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “incorrect receipt or rejection of evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.