527 So. 2d 654 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2014
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McFee v. State · Barnes v. State · Weathersby v. State · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellant contends the court erred in refusing to grant him a peremptory instruction following the rule stated in Weathersby v. State, 165 Miss. 207 , 147 So. 481 (1933). That rule follows: Where the defendant or the defendant's witnesses are the only witnesses to the homicide, their version, if reasonable, must be accepted as true, unless substantially contradicted in material particulars by a credible witness or witnesses for the State, or by the physical facts, or by the facts of common knowledge. 165 Miss. at 209 , 147 So. at 482 . In Berry v. State, 455 So.2d 774, 776 (Miss. 1984), we said: "This Court has stated that it is a rare case that meets the requirements of Weathersby. " In the case sub judice, the evidence introduced by the State conflicts with the version advanced by the appellant and removes the case from the Weathersby rule... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thornhill v. State“[w]here the fact that a particular statement was made is of itself a relevant fact, regardless of the truth or falsity of such statement, the statement is admissible in evidence as an independently relevant fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.