Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 SO2D 764 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The plain view doctrine authorizes the warrantless seizure of personal property where the initial intrusion which affords the officers a plain view is lawful, the discovery of the property is inadvertent, and the incriminating nature of the property is 'immediately apparent.' "”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'immediately apparent' does not 'imply that an unduly high degree of certainty as to the incriminatory character of evidence is necessary . . .' [nor does it] mean that an officer must 'be possessed of near certainty as to the seizable nature of the items.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'practical, nontechnical' probability that incriminating evidence is involved is all that is required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.