Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

527 So. 2d 855

527 So.2d 855

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1359

Sobel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-06-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1989

2 state decisions

Relies on Knight v. State · Sobel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from an order, summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse and remand.

¶2The dissent in Sobel v. State, 437 So.2d 144 (Fla.1983), spelled out originally what allegedly occurred here. In our view appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon her sworn, forty-four page motion. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981). Upon remand, counsel shall be appointed to represent appellant in the trial court. Appellate counsel is unnecessary for the current review.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
/527/so2d/855 · .json · Public domain