¶1The reasons assigned below for a substantial upwards departure from the sentencing guidelines are either insufficient as a matter of law, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); Watkins v. State, 498 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Carnegie v. State, 498 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); see generally Steiner v. State, 469 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), pet. for review denied, 479 So.2d 118 (Fla.1985), or were not, as required, established beyond a reasonable doubt as a matter of fact. State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986). Consequently, the sentence under review is reversed and the cause remanded with di*953rections to resentence the defendant within the guidelines.
527 So. 2d 952
527 So.2d 952
13 Fla.L.Weekly 1570
Alexander v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 5, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-07-05
Relies on 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 479 So. 2d 114 - METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co. · 489 So. 2d 25 - Scurry v. State
Decided 1988-07-05