Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 SW2D 119 - Swain v. State

Swain v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2015

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

6019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Estrin v. Moss · State Ex Rel. Brown v. Newell · United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... the law need not be in every respect logically consistent with its aims to be constitutional. It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.... The legislature may select one phase of one field and apply a remedy there, neglecting the others_ The prohibition of the Equal Protection Clause goes no further than the invidious discrimination.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In enacting the Drug Control Law of 1971, the Legislature no doubt considered the cause-and-effect relationship between drug pushing and the tremendous increase of all types of offenses against society. It has been held that engaging in narcotics traffic and a conviction for conspiracy to deal in and distribute heroin warrants a finding that the defendant is a ‘danger to the community’, see U. S. v. Erwing, 280 F.Supp. 814 (N.D.Cal.1968).” Id. at 121.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.