Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2007
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cherb v. State · Payne v. State · Reynolds v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 252 - Donald v. State · Salas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the State offered no evidence to support the allegation tolling the statute of limitations ... No effort was made by the State to offer in evidence any prior indictment against appellant for this offense. No probative evidence was offered to the jury, the fact finder in the case, that a prior indictment charging appellant with the same offense was pending as alleged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Van Hoang v. State“it is necessary that the proof show that the offense was committed at such time as that the prosecution would not be barred by the statute of limitation.” (emphasis added). The Court then went on to emphasize that “proof”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Van Hoang v. State“Likewise, statements made in a pretrial motion would not constitute proof where such statements did not go to the jury as evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Van Hoang v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.