State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Walker · State v. Feger · State v. Cox · State v. Jordan · State v. Holmes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At the outset we recognize that a prosecutor has the right to draw any inference from the evidence which he in good faith believes to be justified. State v. Feger, 340 S.W.2d 716, 728 [24] (Mo. 1960). Moreover, the trial court has wide discretion in determining latitude in permitting argument of counsel, and we will not reverse unless this discretion has been abused resulting in prejudice to the defendant. State v. Kimmins, 514 S.W.2d 381, 382 [1] (Mo.App.1974)....” State v. Smith, 527 S.W.2d 731, 733 (Mo. App.1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.