Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Luleff v. State · Sanders v. State · Charles K. Moore v. State of Missouri · Travis M. Stanley v. State of Missouri · Woltering v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an untimely amended motion is filed, the motion court has a duty to undertake an independent inquiry ... to determine if abandonment occurred. As a result, if we determine that an amended motion filed by post-conviction counsel is untimely, but there has been no independent inquiry into abandonment conducted by the motion court, then the case must be remanded to the motion court. While it is this Court's duty to enforce the mandatory timelines in the post-conviction rules, the motion court is the appropriate forum to conduct the abandonment inquiry. In the event a case is remanded to the motion court for an abandonment inquiry, the result of the inquiry determines which motion, the pro se motion or the amended motion, the motion court should adjudicate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. State“the amended motion shall be filed within sixty days of the earlier of: (1) the date both a complete transcript consisting of the guilty plea and sentencing hearing has been filed in the trial court and counsel is appointed or (2) the date both a complete transcript has been filed in the trial court and an entry of appearance is filed by any counsel that is not appointed but enters an appearance on behalf of movant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. State“all of the claims in both the pro se and amended motion ha[d] been adjudicated with written findings of fact and conclusions of law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.