Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 SW3D 151 - Hoeper v. Liley

Hoeper v. Liley’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Nelson v. Hotchkiss · Howard v. City of Kansas City · Russell v. Russell · Jaycox v. Brune

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court is considered an expert on fees, given its familiarity with all of the issues in the case and with the character of the legal services rendered,' and 'may determine attorney fees without the aid of evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, unless it erroneously declares the law, or unless it erroneously applies the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'decision was against the logic of the circumstances and so arbitrary and unreasonable as to shock one's sense of justice.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.