Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

527 S.W.3d 188

Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2017

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2017-08-29

Decided 2017-08-29

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Lashawn Wooten appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015.

/527/sw3d/188 · .json · Public domain