United States v. Vanderpool’s Empirical Analysis
528 F.2d 1205 · 1975
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2021
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · United States v. Maze · United States v. Sampson · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Adams v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is adequate circumstantial evidence to show authorization due to the fact that the representations were substantially similar to those made by defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'(a)voidance of detection and prevention of recovery of money lost by the victims are within, and often a material part of, the illegal scheme.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.