Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 F.2d 290 - West v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad

West v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

528 F.2d 290 · 1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1990

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

100197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road · Williams v. Nichols

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “concluded that the jury could properly have returned the verdict that it did”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “untoward, inordinate, unreasonable or outrageous,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.