Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 F.2d 426 - Culbertson v. Leland

Culbertson v. Leland’s Empirical Analysis

528 F.2d 426 · 1975

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Stypmann v. City & County of San Francisco (1977), Bosse v. Crowell Collier & Macmillan (1977)

15 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

23019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · Boddie v. Connecticut · Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority · United States v. Classic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lien; no state action); Philips v. Money, 503 F.2d 990 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 934 , 95 S.Ct. 1141 , 43 L.Ed.2d 409 (1975) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “lien; state action); Davis v. Richmond, 512 F.2d 201 (1st Cir. 1975) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Statutes and laws regulate many forms of purely private activity, such as contractual relations and gifts, and subjecting all behavior that conforms to state law to the Fourteenth Amendment would emasculate the state action concept.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.