Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 F.2d 920 - Shaffer v. United States

Shaffer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

528 F.2d 920 · 1975

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2006

9 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1101975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marchetti v. United States · Grosso v. United States · United States v. United States Coin & Currency · United States v. Holley · Iannelli v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is of course the danger that the collection procedure has been instituted to coerce the taxpayer to incriminate himself with respect to a potential criminal prosecution that gives us pause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.