United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
528 F.3d 423 · 2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2021
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Bond · United States v. Broughton-Jones · United States v. Ready · United States v. Rodriguez · United States v. Valencia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to address the issue of whether a general appeal waiver bars review of a restitution order when the plea agreement does not discuss restitution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“appeal is more easily resolved on the merits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.