Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 FAPPX 186 - Flaghouse, Inc. v. Prosource Development, Inc.

Flaghouse, Inc. v. Prosource Development, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Calder v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under New Jersey law, agreements to arbitrate with 'arising out of' language are typically construed broadly in favor of arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any claim arising out of or relating to this Subcontract ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.