McCoog v. Hegstrom’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 612 (§ 412 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · King v. Smith · Lewis v. Martin · Van Lare v. Hurley · Johnson v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“-the other parent, a stepparent, sibling, or other close relative. Id. § 606(a)(1). If the caretaker relative is also needy, he or she can be added to the grant. 4 The Oregon ADC grant consists of allowances for shelter, food, clothing, household supplies, and personal incidentals. 2 While each state participating in the ADC program has the option of calculating ADC benefits on an individualized basis, Oregon, like most states, has chosen, presumably for administrative convenience, to use a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A home is the family setting maintained or in the process of being established, as evidenced by assumption and continuation of responsibility for day to day care of the child by the relative with whom the child is living.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall not be regarded as failing to comply with the requirements”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.