Johnson v. Folino’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on United States Touhy v. Ragen · Exxon Shipping Co · Comsat Corporation v. National Science Foundation, and National Science Foundation Document Custodian Robert J. Dickman Hugh Van Horn, Comsat Corporation v. National Science Foundation National Science Foundation Document Custodian Robert J. Dickman Hugh Van Horn · Davis Enterprises v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Laxalt v. Ck McClatchy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Fourth and Eleventh Circuits review the agency’s decision under the APA’s arbitrary and capricious standard.... On the other hand, the D.C. and Ninth Circuits conduct an analysis under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45.... The Second Circuit initially adopted the arbitrary and capricious standard, but, on reconsideration, vacated it decision and reserved the question for the future.” 6 . I decline the request of the USPS to allow it to file a declaration in further support of its decision. See Response [Doc. # 28] at p. 14. The USPS refused the defendant’s request for information in a written Letter [Doc. #21-2]; made its Written Objection to the subpoenas [Doc. #21-3]; and was allowed to file a Response to the Motion to Compel containing all arguments and evidence it believed necessary. The declaration contemplated by the request for further submissions should have been provided previously, and no adequate explanation is offered for the failure to do so. 7 . The term "General Counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.