Datastaff Technology Group, Inc. v. Centex Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 40 U.S.C. § 3131 · 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile 'the existence of an express contract between A and B undermines a quantum meruit claim between A and C for those same services,' summary judgment on this claim is improper on the current record ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.