Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 N.E.2d 484 - McKim v. State

McKim v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2010

7 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKim v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an attorney, on request, refuses to deliver over ... papers to a person from whom or for whom he has received them, in the course of his professional employment, whether in an action or not, he may be required, after reasonable notice, on motion of any party aggrieved, by an order of the court in which an action, if any, was prosecuted ... to do so, within a specified time, or show cause why he should not be punished for contempt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as ... surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[uJpon motion by the party represented, the trial court shall require an attorney to deliver all papers he obtained pertaining to the representation to which the client is entitled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.