Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 NE2D 792 - Austin v. State

Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lasley v. State · 182 Ind. App. 224 - Ford v. State · Stivers v. Knox County Department of Public Welfare · Calvert v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I)n the absence of cireumstances supporting a contrary conclusion, we assume the judge would have complied with the obligation to disqualify [himjself had there been any reasonable question concerning”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “apply to appellate review of fines as well as of incarceration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.