Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 So. 2d 1274 - State v. Thomas

528 So. 2d 1274 - State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2013

5 state decisions

201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Va. App. 599 - Roanoke Memorial Hospitals v. Kenley · 519 So. 2d 611 - Atwaters v. State · 415 So. 2d 109 - Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. State · 58 Cal. App. 3d 406 - Cuevas v. Superior Court · State v. Mesa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ought should be reserved for expressions of necessity, duty or obligation; should, the slightly weaker word, expresses mere appropriateness, suitability or fittingness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he word `should' in the rule which the plaintiff invokes is directory. Being directory, a deviation is excusable under proper circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the weaker companion to the obligatory `ought.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.