Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

528 So. 2d 1377

528 So.2d 1377

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1884

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 1988

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-08-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1992

5 state decisions

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-08-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony contradicting appellant’s statements to police about his place of residence. However, we believe the admission of such testimony was harmless and affirm appellant’s conviction.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.
ANSTEAD, Judge,

¶2dissenting.

¶3I agree that hearsay evidence was erroneously admitted, but I cannot agree that its admission was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

/528/so2d/1377 · .json · Public domain