528 So. 2d 343 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 570 So. 2d 703 - Newsome v. State (1990), Maples v. State (1999)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Mooney v. Holohan · Willard Dairy Corp. v. National Dairy Products Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Of course, `prejudice, in this context, means more than simply damage to the opponent's cause. A party's case is always damaged by evidence that the facts are contrary to his contention; but that cannot be ground for exclusion. What is meant here is an undue tendency to move the tribunal to decide on an improper basis, commonly, though not always, an emotional one.'”
27 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Knight v. State · Stephens v. State“'The principle of Mooney v. Holohan , [ 294 U.S. 103 , 55 S.Ct. 340 , 79 L.Ed. 791 (1935)], is not punishment of society for misdeeds of a prosecutor but avoidance of an unfair trial to the accused.' Brady , 373 U.S. at 87 , 83 S.Ct. at 1197 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“' "If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this [ Brady ] rule, or with an order issued pursuant to this rule, the court may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection; grant a continuance if requested by the aggrieved party; prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed; or enter such other order as the court deems just under the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.