Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 SW2D 255 - Pool v. State

Pool v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bradshaw v. State · 157 Tex. Crim. 178 - Pollan v. State · Hochman v. State · 87 Tex. Crim. 19 - Grant v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the circumstantial evidence relied on by the prosecution is obviously weak, and where the record on appeal affirmatively shows not only that other testimony which would have cast additional light on the facts was available to the prosecution, but also that the prosecution did not introduce such other evidence or satisfactorily account for its failure to do so, the appellate court will treat the case as one showing reasonable doubt of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) he exercises control over the property, other than real property, unlawfully.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.