Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 SW2D 422 - Preisler v. Kirkpatrick

Preisler v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2012

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Sims · Mahan v. Howell · Hearne v. E Smylie · State ex rel. Lamb v. Cunningham · State ex rel. Barrett v. Hitchcock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no part of any district is physically separate from any other part”); Specter, supra, 293 A.2d at 23 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.