Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 SW2D 513 - State v. Fleming

State v. Fleming’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

11019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Amsden · State v. Stewart · State v. Mesmer · United States v. Eisenberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'An instruction on a lesser offense is not proper unless it is impossible to commit the greater without first committing the lesser, for otherwise the lesser is not properly a lesser offense to the greater.... [T]o be a necessarily included offense it is essential that the greater offense include all of the legal and factual elements of the lesser.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘If the greater of two offenses includes all the legal and factual elements of the lesser, the greater includes the lesser; but if the lesser offense requires the inclusion of some necessary element not so included in the greater offense, the lesser is not necessarily included in the greater’.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “with the intent to steal or commit any crime therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.