Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 528 SW2D 708 - R. E. Gaddie, Inc. v. Price

R. E. Gaddie, Inc. v. Price’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Young v. De Bord · Adams v. Parsons · WL Harper Company v. Slusher · Yates v. Wilson Bros. Trucking Co. · General Telephone Company of Kentucky v. Yount

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principal difference in the Restatement Standards applicable to recovery by the helpless plaintiff and the inattentive plaintiff is that the helpless plaintiff may recover if the defendant in the exercise of ordinary care should discover the plaintiff’s situation while the inattentive plaintiff may not recover unless the defendant knows the plaintiff’s situation and realizes or has reason to realize that the plaintiff is inattentive and unlikely to discover his peril.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Failure of appellant to discuss the alleged errors in its brief is the same as if no brief had been filed in support of its charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.