Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

528 U.S. 949

Slack v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1999

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1999-10-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2004

2 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 525 U. S. 1138.] Case restored to calendar for reargument. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 25 pages addressing the following questions: “(1) Do the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death' Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), specifically including 28 U. S. C. § 2253(c) and 28 U. S. C. § 2244(b), control the proceedings on appeal? (2) If AEDPA does control the proceedings on appeal, may a certificate of appealability issue under 28 U. S. C. § 2253(c)?” Briefs are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing parties on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, December 15, 1999. Reply briefs, if any, not to exceed 10 pages, are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing parties on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 14, 2000. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief, not to exceed 25 pages, expressing the views of the United States. Any brief as amicus curiae, not to exceed 15 pages, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon the parties on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, December 15,1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

/528/us/949 · .json · Public domain