Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 F.2d 1178 - United States v. Adderly

United States v. Adderly’s Empirical Analysis

529 F.2d 1178 · 1976

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
6
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Beechum (1978), United States v. Hearst (1977)

37 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

24019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Weiss v. United States · United States v. Goodwin · United States v. Crimmins · Helton v. United States · United States v. Ring

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[W]here the government could anticipate the defense testimony because of [a] previous trial which resulted in a hung jury,' it was not error to admit evidence of other crimes to show intent in the government's case in chief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(i)t is only after the defense is presented that the trial judge can know if intent or knowledge or any exception to the exclusion rule is truly a disputed issue in the trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by its (conspiracy's) very nature requires an element of intent or knowledge sufficient to allow an exception to the general rule of exclusion of prior misconduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.