Miller v. Granados’s Empirical Analysis
529 F.2d 393 · 1976
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. v. Diversified Packaging Corp. (1977), Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co. (1977)
19 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Parker v. Brown · Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under the aforementioned authorities we find that Count I of the complaint alleges all of the elements of a tie-in arrangement involving a not insubstantial amount of interstate commerce, and sufficient economic leverage in the market with the potential of destroying free competition, which allegations on their face state a cause of action cognizable under the Sherman Act. Because of the grant by Congress to federal courts of exclusive jurisdiction over the anti-trust laws of the United States, it was error for the District Court to dismiss the complaint." Id. at 397 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a tie-in agreement of two products, (1) the condominium unit, the purchase of which is mandatorily tied in to (2) the agreement [the management service contract].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.