Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 F.2d 498 - Dolores Torriente v. Ronald E. Stackler

Dolores Torriente v. Ronald E. Stackler’s Empirical Analysis

529 F.2d 498 · 1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1995

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

20197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jenkins v. McKeithen · Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp. · Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Hubel v. West Virginia Racing Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever the Director is satisfied that substantial justice has not been done either in an examination, or in a formal disciplinary action, or refusal to restore a license or certificate, he may order a re-examination or re-hearing by the same or other examiners.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.