Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 F.2d 581 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

529 F.2d 581 · 1976

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
8
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Carter (1989), Nash v. Estelle (1979)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

210197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 495

Relies on Michigan v. Mosley · Patterson v. Medberry · United States v. Nielsen · Evans v. United States · Moore v. Wolff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant did not * * * rebut the government's version of the circumstances surrounding the statement, and the defendant has never contended that the agents in any improper way induced him to talk after the warnings were given. Further, the defendant did sign a form indicating that he had received and understood those warnings.” Johnson, supra, 529 F.2d at 584 . In Ford , the court found that the defendant had been treated courteously, and that her rights had been given to her in both English and Thai, her native language. She waived those rights, but during questioning there were”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] voluntary waiver need not assume any particular form; it may be either oral or in writing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.