United States v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
529 F.2d 913 · 1976
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2008
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1792
Relies on Braswell v. United States · Manning v. United States · Kelly v. United States · Yarbrough v. United States · United States v. Charpentier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no suggestion that Wilson’s earlier testimony in the Martin triáis was involuntarily given or that he was not fully advised of his Constitutional rights. In each of Martin’s two trials Wilson was represented by his own counsel and the trial court in each instance fully advised Wilson of his panoply of rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schomaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.