Perez v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
529 F.3d 588 · 2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2021
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Mims v. United States · 663 So. 2d 27 - State v. Silman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the question under the Jackson sufficiency standard is whether ... any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was insane at the time of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers“any rational trier of fact could have found that Hebert had not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that she was insane at the time of the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers“with all evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the state. This interpretation conflicts with our precedent stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.