Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 NW2D 583 - Baker v. Dakota Mining & Construction

Baker v. Dakota Mining & Construction’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division · Petersen v. Hinky Dinky · Shepherd v. Moorman Manufacturing · Wendel v. Domestic Seed & Supply · City of Casper v. Bowdish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] person is totally disabled if his physical condition, in combination with his age, training, and experience, and the type of work available in his community, causes him to be unable to secure anything more than sporadic employment resulting in insubstantial income.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.