Janski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1985
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sorrells v. United States · United States v. Costello · Gifford-Hill-Western, Inc. v. Anderson · Vinich v. Teton Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We make no determination as to the correctness of the instruction on entrapment because there was no objection to it by the State, and therefore as to the state the instruction became the law of the case and is not open to review by this court on appeal. Vinich v. Teton Construction Co., Wyo., 518 P.2d 137, 138 ; Gifford-Hill Western, Inc. v. Anderson, Wyo., 496 P.2d 501, 503 , and 88 C.J.S. Trial § 425, p. 1151. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. State““To determine whether entrapment has been established, a line must be drawn between the trap for the unwary innocent, and the trap for the unwary whose criminal conduct was due to his own READINESS AND WHO HIMSELF PLANNED TO COMMIT THE CRIME." [Emphasis mine]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Janski v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.