Neal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
June 1986
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · Buchanan v. State · Tilford v. State · 22 Okla. Crim. 27 - Soper v. State · 58 Okla. Crim. 239 - Teague v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where there is competent evidence in the record from ■ which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty as charged, the Court of Criminal Appeals will not interfere with the verdict, . . . since it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts. .” (Citation omitted)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rice v. State · Tharps v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.