529 So. 2d 1029 - Bogan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

cited by 35 later decisions

states following

August 2003

most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2003 · most notably Dill v. State (1991), 555 So. 2d 818 - Johnson v. State (1989)

35 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palermo v. United States · Anderson v. Charles · Knight v. State · 494 So. 2d 750 - Bradley v. State · 494 So. 2d 772 - Ex Parte Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"Except as provided in (a) [concerning statements of the defendant], (b) [concerning statements of codefendants or accomplices], and (d) [concerning reports of examinations and tests], the discovery or inspection of reports, memoranda, witness lists, or other internal state documents made by the district attorney or his agents, or by law enforcement agents, in connection with the investigation or prosecution of the case, or of statements made by state witnesses or prospective state witnesses, is not authorized."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 555 So. 2d 818 - Johnson v. State · 587 So. 2d 1260 - Duncan v. State
“"No party may assign as error the court's giving or failing to give a written instruction, or the giving of an erroneous, misleading, incomplete, or otherwise improper oral charge, unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection. . . . Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury. . . ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 551 So. 2d 429 - Corbin v. State · 581 So. 2d 1266 - Coffey v. State
“"In any criminal prosecution brought by the United States, no statement or report in the possession of the United States which was made by a Government witness or prospective Government witness (other than the defendant) shall be the subject of subpena, discovery, or inspection until said witness has testified on direct examination in the trial of the case. " (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 555 So. 2d 818 - Johnson v. State · 587 So. 2d 1260 - Duncan v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.