Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 So. 2d 1106 - Smith v. State

529 So. 2d 1106 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably 682 So. 2d 536 - Franquiz v. State (1996), State v. Williams (1996)

25 state decisions

190198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 527 So. 2d 1380 - Florida Bar v. Mullins · 473 So. 2d 31 - Geter v. State · 513 So. 2d 197 - Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce a plea agreement is negotiated which specifies the permissible sentence, the agreement is binding and is sufficient without any stated reasons to justify a departure from the presumptive sentence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Nickerson · 569 So. 2d 1351 - Casmay v. State
  2. “IS A PLEA AGREEMENT, PROVIDING ONLY FOR A SENTENCE WITHIN A TERM LESS THAN THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE CHARGED OFFENSE, AN ADEQUATE REASON FOR EXCEEDING GUIDELINES UP TO THE AGREED MAXIMUM WITHOUT STATING REASONS OTHER THAN THE FACT OF THE AGREEMENT?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 569 So. 2d 1351 - Casmay v. State · State v. Williams
  3. “We find no impropriety in allowing a defendant charged with only one offense to negotiate a plea agreement that provides a sentencing cap which is less than the statutory maximum in order to limit his exposure to jail time if the trial judge elects to depart from the recommended guidelines sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Williams

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.