Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 So. 2d 269 - Merckle v. State

529 So. 2d 269 - Merckle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2004

6 state decisions

40198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 458 So. 2d 37 - Mischler v. State · 466 So. 2d 1144 - Baker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the fraudulent appropriation of another's property by a person to whom it had been entrusted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.