Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · 351 So. 2d 972 - McArthur v. State · Brown v. State · Frank v. State · 394 So. 2d 1150 - Kirkland Masonry, Inc. v. Lorey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(5) Scales and balances used, intended for use, or designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not only ... that the [papers] could be so used, but also that by reason of some peculiar characteristic of design the [papers] could be recognized as being intended only for such use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Use or Possession of Drug Paraphernalia— It is unlawful for any person to use, or possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frazier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.