State v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1990
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · Bottoson v. Florida · Miller v. Haynes · Mucci v. United States · 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Criminal negligence exists when, although neither specific nor general criminal intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender’s conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prophet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.