Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 So. 2d 466 - State v. Johnson

529 So. 2d 466 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably 750 So. 2d 1036 - State v. Hotoph (1999), 591 So. 2d 391 - State v. Turner (1991)

43 state decisions

3201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wade v. Hunter · Crist v. Bretz · 439 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Korman · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson · Louisiana Resources Co. v. Stream

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Oral sexual battery is the intentional engaging in any of the following acts with another person, who is not the spouse of the offender, when the offender either compels the other person to submit by placing the person in fear of receiving bodily harm, or when the other person has not yet attained fifteen years of age and is at least three years younger than the offender: (1) The touching of the anus or genitals of the victim by the offender using the mouth or tongue of the offender; or (2) The touching of the anus or genitals of the offender by the victim using the mouth or tongue of the victim. B. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The testimony of the victim alone is sufficient to prove the elements of the offense. The trier of fact may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness. Moreover, when there is conflicting testimony about factual matters, the resolution of which depends upon a determination of the credibility of the witnesses, the matter is one of the weight of the evidence, not its sufficiency. State v. Johnson, 529 So.2d 466, 473 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988), writ denied, 536 So.2d 1233 (La.1989).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was eventually tried by the same jury that had been empaneled and sworn prior to the recess”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.