Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 529 SO2D 537 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2017

6 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 77 - Mhoon v. State · 511 So. 2d 1368 - Tolbert v. State · 355 So. 2d 1381 - Odom v. State · 513 So. 2d 603 - Stevens v. State · Logan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is, of course, a judicial question as to whether a jury is fair and impartial and the court's judgment will not be disturbed unless it appears clearly that it is wrong.... [N]o firm, unbending rule can be laid down that would control every situation that might arise on the voir dire of prospective jurors. Therefore, each case must be decided on an ad hoc basis considering the facts then before the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the question propounded to the juror was (1) relevant to the voir dire examination; (2) . . . unambiguous; . . . (3) . . . the juror had substantial knowledge of the information sought to be elicited . . . [and (4)] prejudice . . . in selecting the jury could reasonably be inferred from the juror's failure to respond.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he lack of any such qualifications on the part of one or more jurors shall not, however, vitiate an indictment or verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.